Trust

Fact-Checking Policy

How we verify what we publish — and how we fix it when we get something wrong.

Trust is the whole product. This page explains how we verify what we publish and how we handle it when a claim needs to change.

Sources we trust

  • Official product docs, changelogs, pricing pages and model cards.
  • Peer-reviewed research and reputable preprints (with clear caveats).
  • First-party benchmarks published by model providers, cross-referenced with independent evaluations.
  • Named on-the-record sources for reporting.

Sources we don't rely on

  • Uncredited screenshots, viral posts, and second-hand summaries.
  • AI-generated "facts" that we can't trace to a primary source.
  • Anonymous claims for high-stakes reporting.

Our verification process

  1. Every factual claim is traced to a primary source before publish.
  2. Numbers, pricing, model names and dates are checked against the vendor's live site.
  3. Screenshots and quotes are dated. If we can't confirm a quote, we don't publish it.
  4. Reviews are based on hands-on testing — not on marketing pages.

Updates and corrections

  • Every article shows a last-updated timestamp when meaningful changes are made.
  • Material corrections are noted at the bottom of the article, with what changed and when.
  • Minor corrections (typos, formatting) are silent.

Report an error

Spotted something wrong? Please tell us. Email bhawaybhalla@gmail.com with the article URL and the correction. We aim to review within two business days.

Related

Editorial Policy · AI Policy · About